The European comparison of absolute gravimeters 2011 (ECAG-2011) in walferdange, Luxembourg

Results and recommendations

verfasst von
Olivier Francis, Henri Baumann, Tomas Volarik, Christian Rothleitner, Gilbert Klein, Marc Seil, Nicolas Dando, Ray Tracey, Christian Ullrich, Stefaan Castelein, Hu Hua, Wu Kang, Shen Chongyang, Xuan Songbo, Tan Hongbo, Li Zhengyuan, Vojtech Pálinkás, Jakub Kostelecký, Jaakko Mäkinen, Jyri Näränen, Sébastien Merlet, Tristan Farah, Christine Guerlin, Franck Pereira Dos Santos, Nicolas Le Moigne, Cédric Champollion, Sabrina Deville, Ludger Timmen, Reinhard Falk, Herbert Wilmes, Domenico Iacovone, Francesco Baccaro, Alessandro Germak, Emanuele Biolcati, Jan Krynski, Marcin Sekowski, Tomasz Olszak, Andrzej Pachuta, Jonas Agren, Andreas Engfeldt, René Reudink, Pedro Inacio, Daniel McLaughlin, Geoff Shannon, Marc Eckl, Tim Wilkins, Derek Van Westrum, Ryan Billson
Abstract

We present the results of the third European Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters held in Walferdange, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, in November 2011. Twenty-two gravimeters from both metrological and non-metrological institutes are compared. For the first time, corrections for the laser beam diffraction and the self-attraction of the gravimeters are implemented. The gravity observations are also corrected for geophysical gravity changes that occurred during the comparison using the observations of a superconducting gravimeter. We show that these corrections improve the degree of equivalence between the gravimeters. We present the results for two different combinations of data. In the first one, we use only the observations from the metrological institutes. In the second solution, we include all the data from both metrological and non-metrological institutes. Those solutions are then compared with the official result of the comparison published previously and based on the observations of the metrological institutes and the gravity differences at the different sites as measured by non-metrological institutes. Overall, the absolute gravity meters agree with one another with a standard deviation of 3.1 μGal. Finally, the results of this comparison are linked to previous ones. We conclude with some important recommendations for future comparisons.

Organisationseinheit(en)
Institut für Erdmessung
Externe Organisation(en)
University of Luxembourg
Eidgenössisches Institut für Metrologie (METAS)
Technische Universität Brünn (VRT)
Geoscience Australia
Bundesamt für Eich- und Vermessungswesen (BEV)
Observatoire royal de Belgique (ROB)
Tsinghua University
China Earthquake Administration (CEA)
Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography and Cartography, Czech Republic
Finnish Geodetic Institute (FGI)
SYRTE - Observatoire de Paris
Universität Montpellier
Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie (BKG)
Italian Space Agency (ASI)
Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRiM)
Instytut Geodezji i Kartografii (IGiK)
Warsaw University of Technology
Lantmäteriet (LM)
Delft University of Technology
National Oceanography Centre
National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
Micro-g LaCoste
Typ
Artikel
Journal
METROLOGIA
Band
50
Seiten
257-268
Anzahl der Seiten
12
ISSN
0026-1394
Publikationsdatum
16.05.2013
Publikationsstatus
Veröffentlicht
Peer-reviewed
Ja
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
Elektronische Version(en)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/50/3/257 (Zugang: Geschlossen)
 

Details im Forschungsportal „Research@Leibniz University“